Payer Underpayment Audits for Newly Negotiated Contracts

Your new rates are signed. Make sure they are being paid.

Payment integrity is a claim-level audit that compares what payers paid against your executed contract rates to find underpayments, loading errors, and missed revenue.

Payers load new fee schedules into their systems by hand, and small errors can run for months without anyone noticing. We check paid claims against your contract terms, so you know exactly what each agreement is delivering.

A short payment looks just like a correct one.

When a claim pays, it looks like a win. There is no alert when the rate is wrong. A loading error, the wrong locality, or a single phrase in a rate exhibit can trim each payment just enough to go unnoticed. Across thousands of claims, these managed care underpayments add up fast.

The clock is also running. Most payer contracts limit how long you have to dispute an underpayment, often 12 months or less. Errors found late may already be out of reach.

What a Payment Integrity audit includes

We validate reimbursement against your executed contract and utilization data, one claim line at a time.

Confirm the contract loaded correctly

We verify that each payer loaded your new fee schedule on time, across every code, location, and provider level.

Find and size the gaps

We flag underpayments, identify the cause, and measure both what has already accrued and what recurs each year.

Measure what the contract is worth

We show how each agreement performs against what was projected, so you can plan compensation, capacity, and your next negotiation.

You receive a findings report and a working spreadsheet your finance team can review line by line.

How it works

Step 1

Share your payment data

We need claim-level remittance data or a de-identified extract from your practice management system.

Step 2

We run the verification

After at least three months of claims have paid under the new rates, we typically deliver findings within a month.

Step 3

Review the findings together

We walk you through what we found, what it means, and which issues are worth raising with the payer.

Case study

What one verification found

A 14-location specialty group asked us to verify four newly renegotiated payer agreements. All four were paying regularly, but our claim-level review found issues no one inside the practice could see.

In that review, Tribunus tested more than 430,000 paid claim lines and found $360,852 a year in recurring underpayments, plus a $236,445 recovery on an underpayment that had run for 19 months.

430,000+

paid claim lines tested against contracted rates

$360,852

in recurring revenue at risk each year

$236,445

recovered on an underpayment that ran 19 months

9 days

to complete all four verifications

Results from one client engagement. Recurring amounts are identified and entitled amounts, not guaranteed collections.

Frequently Asked Questions

Know what your contracts are actually paying.

Add Payment Integrity to your renegotiation, or ask us about reviewing an agreement you already have.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)